This is a theoretical paper on "Deep Learning" misconduct in particular and Post-Selection in general. As far as the author knows, the first peer-reviewed papers on Deep Learning misconduct are [32], [37], [36]. Regardless of learning modes, e.g., supervised, reinforcement, adversarial, and evolutional, almost all machine learning methods (except for a few methods that train a sole system) are rooted in the same misconduct -- cheating and hiding -- (1) cheating in the absence of a test and (2) hiding bad-looking data. It was reasoned in [32], [37], [36] that authors must report at least the average error of all trained networks, good and bad, on the validation set (called general cross-validation in this paper). Better, report also five percentage positions of ranked errors. From the new analysis here, we can see that the hidden culprit is Post-Selection. This is also true for Post-Selection on hand-tuned or searched hyperparameters, because they are random, depending on random observation data. Does cross-validation on data splits rescue Post-Selections from the Misconducts (1) and (2)? The new result here says: No. Specifically, this paper reveals that using cross-validation for data splits is insufficient to exonerate Post-Selections in machine learning. In general, Post-Selections of statistical learners based on their errors on the validation set are statistically invalid.

ChatGPT is one of the most popular language models which achieve amazing performance on various natural language tasks. Consequently, there is also an urgent need to detect the texts generated ChatGPT from human written. One of the extensively studied methods trains classification models to distinguish both. However, existing studies also demonstrate that the trained models may suffer from distribution shifts (during test), i.e., they are ineffective to predict the generated texts from unseen language tasks or topics. In this work, we aim to have a comprehensive investigation on these methods' generalization behaviors under distribution shift caused by a wide range of factors, including prompts, text lengths, topics, and language tasks. To achieve this goal, we first collect a new dataset with human and ChatGPT texts, and then we conduct extensive studies on the collected dataset. Our studies unveil insightful findings which provide guidance for developing future methodologies or data collection strategies for ChatGPT detection.

This is a theoretical paper, as a companion paper of the keynote talk at the same conference AIEE 2023. In contrast to conscious learning, many projects in AI have employed so-called "deep learning" many of which seemed to give impressive performance. This paper explains that such performance data are deceptively inflated due to two misconducts: "data deletion" and "test on training set". This paper clarifies "data deletion" and "test on training set" in deep learning and why they are misconducts. A simple classification method is defined, called Nearest Neighbor With Threshold (NNWT). A theorem is established that the NNWT method reaches a zero error on any validation set and any test set using the two misconducts, as long as the test set is in the possession of the author and both the amount of storage space and the time of training are finite but unbounded like with many deep learning methods. However, many deep learning methods, like the NNWT method, are all not generalizable since they have never been tested by a true test set. Why? The so-called "test set" was used in the Post-Selection step of the training stage. The evidence that misconducts actually took place in many deep learning projects is beyond the scope of this paper.

Deep learning has been shown to be useful to detect breast cancer metastases by analyzing whole slide images of sentinel lymph nodes. However, it requires extensive scanning and analysis of all the lymph nodes slides for each case. Our deep learning study focuses on breast cancer screening with only a small set of image patches from any sentinel lymph node, positive or negative for metastasis, to detect changes in tumor environment and not in the tumor itself. We design a convolutional neural network in the Python language to build a diagnostic model for this purpose. The excellent results from this preliminary study provided a proof of concept for incorporating automated metastatic screen into the digital pathology workflow to augment the pathologists' productivity. Our approach is unique since it provides a very rapid screen rather than an exhaustive search for tumor in all fields of all sentinel lymph nodes.

Strong AI requires the learning engine to be task non-specific and to automatically construct a dynamic hierarchy of internal features. By hierarchy, we mean, e.g., short road edges and short bush edges amount to intermediate features of landmarks; but intermediate features from tree shadows are distractors that must be disregarded by the high-level landmark concept. By dynamic, we mean the automatic selection of features while disregarding distractors is not static, but instead based on dynamic statistics (e.g. because of the instability of shadows in the context of landmark). By internal features, we mean that they are not only sensory, but also motor, so that context from motor (state) integrates with sensory inputs to become a context-based logic machine. We present why strong AI is necessary for any practical AI systems that work reliably in the real world. We then present a new generation of Developmental Networks 2 (DN-2). With many new novelties beyond DN-1, the most important novelty of DN-2 is that the inhibition area of each internal neuron is neuron-specific and dynamic. This enables DN-2 to automatically construct an internal hierarchy that is fluid, whose number of areas is not static as in DN-1. To optimally use the limited resource available, we establish that DN-2 is optimal in terms of maximum likelihood, under the condition of limited learning experience and limited resources. We also present how DN-2 can learn an emergent Universal Turing Machine (UTM). Together with the optimality, we present the optimal UTM. Experiments for real-world vision-based navigation, maze planning, and audition used DN-2. They successfully showed that DN-2 is for general purposes using natural and synthetic inputs. Their automatically constructed internal representation focuses on important features while being invariant to distractors and other irrelevant context-concepts.

For example, a "what" concept is "where"-invariant and a "where" concept is "what"-invariant, as explained in [55], [68]. Section IV discusses an optimal framework through which such abstractions can take place from learning simple rules during early life that enable learning of more complex rules during later life-- called scaffolding [69]. Theorem 2 leads to two observations on data fitting on a static data set: Observation 1: Any data fitting on a static data set without learning invariant concepts are nonscalable, including the n-fold cross-validation discussed below. Unfortunately, data fitting on a static data set is a norm in all ImageNet Contests [66]. Namely, the remaining subsections in this section analyze approaches that are nonscalable. For example, computer vision is not a "one-shot" pattern classification problem as argued by Li Fei-Fei et al. [19] (which was questioned in PubMed without responses), but rather a spatiotemporal problem to learn various invariant concepts present in cluttered natural scenes through autonomous attention saccades, as explained further in Observation 2. Observation 2: Learning invariant concepts seem nonscalable for any data fitting on a static data set either, because there are too many images to be labeled by hand (e.g., all pixel locations) [55], [68]. Like a human baby, any scalable machine learning methods must be conscious through which the machine learner must consciously guess concepts (i.e., not just active learning [70]) (e.g., an object type) and verify their invariance rules (e.g., the where-invariance of a what concept).

Recent studies have shown promising results in using Deep Learning to detect malignancy in whole slide imaging. However, they were limited to just predicting positive or negative finding for a specific neoplasm. We attempted to use Deep Learning with a convolutional neural network algorithm to build a lymphoma diagnostic model for four diagnostic categories: benign lymph node, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, and small lymphocytic lymphoma. Our software was written in Python language. We obtained digital whole slide images of Hematoxylin and Eosin stained slides of 128 cases including 32 cases for each diagnostic category. Four sets of 5 representative images, 40x40 pixels in dimension, were taken for each case. A total of 2,560 images were obtained from which 1,856 were used for training, 464 for validation and 240 for testing. For each test set of 5 images, the predicted diagnosis was combined from prediction of 5 images. The test results showed excellent diagnostic accuracy at 95% for image-by-image prediction and at 10% for set-by-set prediction. This preliminary study provided a proof of concept for incorporating automated lymphoma diagnostic screen into future pathology workflow to augment the pathologists' productivity.

The Universal Turing Machine (TM) is a model for VonNeumann computers --- general-purpose computers. A human brain can inside-skull-automatically learn a universal TM so that he acts as a general-purpose computer and writes a computer program for any practical purposes. It is unknown whether a machine can accomplish the same. This theoretical work shows how the Developmental Network (DN) can accomplish this. Unlike a traditional TM, the TM learned by DN is a super TM --- Grounded, Emergent, Natural, Incremental, Skulled, Attentive, Motivated, and Abstractive (GENISAMA). A DN is free of any central controller (e.g., Master Map, convolution, or error back-propagation). Its learning from a teacher TM is one transition observation at a time, immediate, and error-free until all its neurons have been initialized by early observed teacher transitions. From that point on, the DN is no longer error-free but is always optimal at every time instance in the sense of maximal likelihood, conditioned on its limited computational resources and the learning experience. This letter also extends the Church-Turing thesis to automatic programming for general purposes and sketchily proved it.